Page 1 of 1

Ok, I have to be the jerk and ask this...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:20 am
by Ed
The one thing that everyone will talk about when they discuss Adepticon 2009 is the 13 foot long Ork War Cruiser. The thing was so awesome that my friends who do not play 40k came to the convention to see it and were blown away. Assuming Hunt for Red Orktober were the guys who made it (I might be wrong, I just saw their banner next to it)...

Why didn't they win a prize for this? There was a Best Theme and some other similar prize category that I felt they should have been considered for. If there is no prize category for rewarding people who make incredible dioramas/displays that fuel excitement for the hobby, there should be. Whoever made that piece showed a passion and dedication that needs to be rewarded.

Anyway, enough from me.

Ed

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:24 pm
by turbo tj
I just want to know if there is a BFG size version that can be in next years tournament and will they return with another model next year.

Hell if they make one for another race we can do a game. 40K/BFG ship-to-ship, boarding actions, etc. Something to think about for next year. Maybe a new kind of team-tournament....
Teams build ships and do kombat.

Re: Ok, I have to be the jerk and ask this...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:30 pm
by artificer
Ed wrote:The one thing that everyone will talk about when they discuss Adepticon 2009 is the 13 foot long Ork War Cruiser. The thing was so awesome that my friends who do not play 40k came to the convention to see it and were blown away. Assuming Hunt for Red Orktober were the guys who made it (I might be wrong, I just saw their banner next to it)...

Why didn't they win a prize for this? There was a Best Theme and some other similar prize category that I felt they should have been considered for. If there is no prize category for rewarding people who make incredible dioramas/displays that fuel excitement for the hobby, there should be. Whoever made that piece showed a passion and dedication that needs to be rewarded.

Anyway, enough from me.

Ed


The piece was indeed incredible. It was made by Matt Sabol, of Sabol Designs. They have done something massive like this at least the last two years.

Re: Ok, I have to be the jerk and ask this...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:45 pm
by Ed
artificer wrote:The piece was indeed incredible. It was made by Matt Sabol, of Sabol Designs. They have done something massive like this at least the last two years.


Ahh, then disregard my whole post. I thought it was made by the Orktober guys.

Ed

Re: Ok, I have to be the jerk and ask this...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:34 pm
by artificer
Ed wrote:
artificer wrote:The piece was indeed incredible. It was made by Matt Sabol, of Sabol Designs. They have done something massive like this at least the last two years.


Ahh, then disregard my whole post. I thought it was made by the Orktober guys.

Ed


It was, sorry to confuse.

Matt Sabol (Sabol Designs) did the massive ship, the name of which was "Red Orktober" as was his teams name. I don't know the rest of his team, we haven't played them in the three years I've been coming.

I forget that not everyone has been here multiple times and may not be familiar with some of the more well known individuals.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:55 pm
by Redbeard
As a response to the original question:

There are many different facets of having a theme. The Hunt for the Red Orktober guys did an amazing job with that display, this is true. But, having a fancy display, even the most fancy display, does not necessarily equate to having the best theme. Theme encompasses far more than just the display.

At some point, 'more' is not necessarily better, and I don't really want to see theme become a more-more-more contest. If the biggest, most-expensive display is required to win Best Theme, that certainly puts the award well out of reach of most of the attendees, and that's not good. So, while having the best display should be worth something (and it is), it shouldn't be worth so much that the other aspects of theme cannot match it.

The team that won the Theme award had a really solid theme, as well as a good display. They based their armies around four of the Black Library books, with their characters, and every unit choice picked to represent something that happened in each of those four books. That's pretty thematic, and I don't think it's fair for anyone to say that they didn't deserve the award because they didn't bring a $10k spaceship model as a display...

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:31 pm
by Ed
Redbeard wrote:The team that won the Theme award had a really solid theme, as well as a good display. They based their armies around four of the Black Library books, with their characters, and every unit choice picked to represent something that happened in each of those four books. That's pretty thematic, and I don't think it's fair for anyone to say that they didn't deserve the award because they didn't bring a $10k spaceship model as a display...


I think what I'd rather say is that there should be a category to reward those who spend crazy amounts of time, effort, and cash to make a thing whose only goal is to impress us. It doesn't even need to impact the scoring at all. Call it the "Holy BLEEP!" award, because that's what people should say when they see it.

Either way, I was there and got to appreciate the thing. I didn't get a chance to see Cede Malis' display, so hopefully there will be some photos of it.

Ed

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 3:42 pm
by Matthias
Ed,

I generally agree with that. I think breaking off Spirit this year was the right move and perhaps what you are talking about falls more into that category, so while breaking Spirit off from the main scoring and awarding it by itself was the right move, perhaps the Spirit points need to be looked at closer for next year.

In that case Red Orktober did extremely well. By pure theme standards - a display base is only worth a max of 5 points (for all the reasons Redbread listed above). Best Team Theme and Presentation is a combination of painting, theme and comp (scored by your opponents).

Bottom line for me - I heard this morning they weren't happy with their theme score and took a second look at the sheets - *if* I had been scoring theme I would have perhaps given them a 41, although that is without being able to look at the unifying details of the actual game models again. Even at 41 - it wouldn't change the overall rewards - nor is it my place to usurp the Theme Judges who actually got out there and looked at the armies and talked to the players.

Without a doubt - Red Orktober was one of the coolest things at the con and something people will be talking about for months to come. I guarantee it was the most photographed thing the entire weekend. I like to think that is what they were truly going for at the end of the day (although that is just how I would view it).

All in all - an insane effort (in the best possible sense) that will be, without a doubt, properly recognized.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:58 pm
by muwhe
I'll add that my sons can not stop talking about the big "ship" at AdeptiCon.

Me: So what was your favorite part of AdeptiCon?

Ethan: That Big Ship Daddy....

Me: What did you like about it ...

Liam: It was Red!

.... future orc players I imagine.

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:21 pm
by RichN
To quote my 4 year old - the best part of visiting Adepticon was the big, huge, gigantic, gigantic, gigantic space ship.

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 10:35 am
by Zaeon
Our buddies won best team spirit, they had matching shirts, dice, laminated army lists and they built a manta. I think they deserved it

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:49 am
by SmokWawelski
Yes, I spoke with one of the guys that did the "Books" army and I could tell how excited and dedicated to staying as close as possible to that theme they were, even at a cost of perhaps not having the "strongest" army. They surely deserved some points for that alone - not bringing a power list.